Search for: "Ibrahim v. Immigration "
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2011, 2:55 pm
Today’s State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
An interesting ruling from the 9th Circuit yesterday in Ibrahim v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 1:13 pm
Released today: this quite significant order, containing the district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law in Ibrahim v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:50 pm
(This is very much a continuation of the issues in LB Harrow v Ibrahim [2008] EWCA Civ 386 - see this previous post on Nearly Legal). [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:55 pm
The nature of the balancing exercise has been the subject of lengthy judicial consideration at the highest level of domestic courts (see, for example, R(Razgar) v SSHD [2004] UKHL 27 and Huang v SSHD [2007] UKHL 11) and it is right that the interest to be balanced against that of Mr Ibrahim and his family is that of the general public or society, not of individual members of it. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
A Court of Appeal case, concerning eligiblity for housing assistance via EU status London Borough of Harrow v Ibrahim & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 386 (21 April 2008) The facts are, briefly, Mrs Ibrahim is a Somali national, married to a Danish national. [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:07 am
Ibrahim v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
The case under the ECHR, art 14 was similarly thin because discrimination on the basis of immigration status is a fundamental and accepted part of both EU and national law and cannot on its own give rise to an issue under art 14. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:19 pm
Girgis agreed to pay both for the flight and the temporary accommodations.A full text version of Ibrahim v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
-based anti-immigrant measures. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:29 pm
In addition, there was not time to consider Teixeira v Lambeth and Ibrahim v Harrow properly, but it may be that further clarification was required in this area. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:29 pm
In addition, there was not time to consider Teixeira v Lambeth and Ibrahim v Harrow properly, but it may be that further clarification was required in this area. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:31 am
Law Webinars - September 2023 Join Us for Constitution Day 2023 - Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:30 pm
Photo by Ibrahim Boran on UnsplashIt is a new year! [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:28 pm
Jain v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
Trump and Hawaii v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 1:55 pm
Circuit’s opinion in al Bahlul v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Baze v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm
Max Hill v Mail on Sunday, A Man v The Gazette (Paisley) Ward v Mail on Sunday. [read post]
